Oh no, not again!

The Rubber Chicken having his revenge was so improbable that he was turned into a bowl of lemons wrapped around a large gold brick. Afterwards, when being interviewed by the Leopard, he was heard to say, "Oh no, not again!"

Tuesday, September 14, 2004

Say it with flowers.

Just as a follow-on from the previous post, "Chivalry of the chicken" I have decided to add a small rant about the possible applications of a chivalrous manner. Firstly, dear readers, I have NO idea whatsoever regarding 'how things are done' in the modern world, so please feel free to enlighten me as to any of these suggestions. And... just to clarify, when I speak of things being done I mean ethics and appropriate behaviours, not anything of a - how shall we say - more personal and private nature.

There are two rather different aspects to chivalry as it relates to being an honourable person. It is a common perception and a widely held belief that if wronged, the honourable person should seek to challenge the wrong doer as an instance of defending their honour. While this is fine, the honourable person should ALWAYS provide a suitable chance for the wrongdoer to see the error of their ways and make ammends before being shot, a la Evariste Galiose. Famous French Mathematician, solved many important problems in abstract algebra, shot aged 20 in a duel that resulted from an argument over a lady...

The second and perhaps less widely agreed upon aspect of chivalry concerns the treatment of a right doer (is that even a proper phrase??!?) But according to the logical law of opposites, it should stand just as strongly. The implications of this are fairly simple: if someone goes out of their way (even only slightly) to do something pleasant for you, the honourable person would immediately seek a way of repaying this gesture.

Now, here is the part where I fall short...

How does one make such a gesture of gratitude without appearing over zealous or making an unwelcome advance? I shall have to think upon this some more.

May all your chickens find themselves in good rubbery health... except Schnitzel who is stuffed already (ha, that was an unfunny joke for a couple of people who might just be reading this...)

Until next time, dear Readers.

7 Comments:

At September 13, 2004 at 9:10 PM, Blogger Lioness said...

Depends on what you want to say and how much of it you want to say, I suppose. Nice original bookmark? Nice original book? Nice original picture frame? If courtesy had no physical substance, maybe you could solve a few equations? Help them (notice use of discreet plural, you Anglo-Saxons get away with so much!) in some other not physically-substantiated way. You don't give out enough details (gender being an important one) and ask for help! I ask you... Flowers. I've learned Americans attach importance to what type of flowers you receive (saw American girl flip out bcs she'd received red roses from some disgusting guy. Mind you, he WAS trying to get into her knickers but roses here are, well, a rose is a rose is a rose). (I'm pedantic today.) So on that you should get help on the home front lest a disgrace happens. Or not! Do keep us posted.

 
At September 13, 2004 at 9:52 PM, Blogger Beleobus said...

Well, in answer to your query: I am MALE. The intended recipient is FEMALE. And the message I wish to convey is: "Thankyou, I did thoroughly appreciate spending time in your company."

But a decision was reached in the end. A selection of ornage and purple tulips. So I shall just patiently wait for the situation to update itself.

Thankyou for your interest, regardless.

 
At September 13, 2004 at 10:17 PM, Blogger the baked turkey said...

Hey B,

Question: Are we talking "chivalry" or are we talking "gentlemanly"?

Chivalry does have that whole female focus, whereas gentlemanly has a more personal or behavoural (that's not really a word is it?) focus.

I do like the fact that the duel was over a lady, but I am unsure if this means he was chivalrous, gentlemanly or silly...

gobble, gobble

 
At September 14, 2004 at 7:24 AM, Blogger Beleobus said...

The story of Galios has two very important morals, both of which I try to tell my year 12 students before their final exams.

1. Maths is more important than your love life.
2. If you stay up too late, you may be dead in the morning.

Point 2 comes from the fact that Galois stayed up to write all his mathematical knowledge down so it would not be lost, in the morning he was so tired he couldn't shoot straight!

 
At September 14, 2004 at 9:57 PM, Blogger Lioness said...

(Regardless???) I know you're MALE. I have trouble sleeping, not seeing! At least close up. Tulips sound lovely!

"1. Maths is more important than your love life.
2. If you stay up too late, you may be dead in the morning."

LOL! I can see how (1) might work with hormonally-mediated 17-year-olds. Re (2): when you stay up too late, you ARE dead in the morning. Or at least it feels that way.

(Baked Turkey - still feeling silly abt calling someone that - "behavioural" is a word. :))

 
At September 15, 2004 at 7:08 AM, Blogger Beleobus said...

Apologies for inapropriate use of our imperfect language. 'Regardless' on the end of that sentence was meant to mean 'I thank you irrespective of whether your insight furthered the cause or not' it was not meant to convey a lack of regards towards you. So I shall sign off with

Kindest Regards

 
At September 16, 2004 at 2:29 AM, Blogger Lioness said...

Well now that's much better.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home